On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Nikhil Komawar <nik.koma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can we make it ? : > > FB 3 > W 6 > C 2 > > Could you elaborate on why you think we need 6 workroom sessions? Back in Tokyo, 5 seemed more than enough and there will be more projects to host in Austin. Cheers, Flavio > > On 2/24/16 10:42 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > > Hey Folks, > > It's that time of the year. We need to choose what our needs with regards > to slots and sessions are for the next summit. > > We can choose among 3 different types of sessions: > > * Fishbowl slots (Wed-Thu) > Our traditional largish rooms organized in fishbowl style, with > advertised session content on the summit schedule for increased external > participation. Ideal for when wider feedback is essential. > > * Workroom slots (Tue-Thu) > Smaller rooms organized in boardroom style, with topic buried in the > session description, in an effort to limit attendance and not overcrowd > the room. Ideal to get work done and prioritize work in small teams. > > * Contributors meetup (Fri) > Half-day session(s) on the Friday to get into the Newton action while > decisions and plans are still hot, or to finish discussions started > during the week, whatever works for you. > > Our usage in Tokyo was: 3, 5, 2 > > I'd recommend we keep it that way. Thoughts? > Cheers, > Flavio > > -- > @flaper87 > Flavio Percoco > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribehttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > -- > > Thanks, > Nikhil > > -- @flaper87 Flavio Percoco
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
