On 03/15/2016 08:22 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > However, at the risk of sounding like a humorless automaton, we have a valid > candidate. > * Monty Taylor for Packaging-Deb PTL https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292690/
This started as a joke. Please don't pick-up the joke, and make it a serious proposal. This isn't funny anymore. Obviously, Monty isn't interested (otherwise, he would have help with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264726/, which he didn't despite his generous offer to do so in Tokyo but he had other priorities). Also again, please have a look at the openstack-pkg-tools Git history here: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-pkg-tools.git/ There's at least 3 commits a week on this repository. Now, compare this to the single commit to add a .gitreview file from Monty: https://github.com/openstack/deb-openstack-pkg-tools/commits/debian/liberty That's also a commit on the Liberty branch, and we've switched to debian/mitaka a long time ago. > Also by the rules I feel like we have no choice but to reject > * Adding Packaging-Deb/Thomas_Goirand.txt https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292885/ I know we have established governance rules. They exist for a reason. Though I hope everyone understand what happened after my explanation. I believe what you wanted to write is: "If we don't think first and follow the rules without even trying to understand, we *WOULD* reject. But we are humans with brains, not machines, therefore, it's ok" Because *you do* have a choice, don't you? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
