On 15/03/2016 21:09, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 08:35:23PM +0000, Hayes, Graham wrote: > >> Does the current PTL not have the ability to propose extra-atc's for >> this reason? >> >> Would a solution be for zigo to propose the people active in >> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-pkg-tools.git/ >> to the governance repo (including himself) and the TC approve it. > > What you say is essentially correct, but the time for such proposals has > passed. The electorate has been defined. > > Anita has provided links to the relevant documentation. > > Yours Tony. >
I do not see the time frame for defining an electorate there. PTL seats are completely renewed every 6 months. A separate election is run for each project team. These elections are collectively held 5 weeks prior to each design summit, with nominations due 6 weeks prior to the summit and elections held open for no less than five business days. The way the rules are currently worded if the extra ATC patch merged before the deadline for PTL nomination anyone in that patch would be able to run. Where do we define the cut off date for electorate definition? - Graham __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
