On 03/30/2016 04:17 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 03/30/2016 12:54 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >>>> - POC of Gabbi for additional API validation >> >> I'm assuming cdent would be driving this, and he's also working on the >> resource providers stuff for the scheduler, but might be a decent side >> project for him to stay sane. > > Actually, Sergey Nikitin can be responsible for driving this effort, > with guidance from Chris. > >>>> - Microversion Testing in Tempest (underway) >> >> How much coverage do we have today? This could be like novaclient where >> people just start hacking on adding tests for each microversion >> (assuming gmann would be working on this). > > I would prefer to see gabbits validating Nova's API back-microversions > and instead focus on Tempest validating only the latest microversion API. > > The validation of all the various microversion variations should IMHO be > the purview of in-tree functional tests within Nova.
That's largely the way it is today, and how I see it going forward (in tree testing for full coverage, a representative cross section in Tempest). There are details on the way Tempest works against all versions of OpenStack that mean that what is in Tempest is really a baseline set of tests, plus some tests which test integration functionality at particular microversions if they are available in the target. -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev