> On Apr 2, 2016, at 1:20 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) <[email protected]> wrote: > > A big correction to this thread below. > > On 4/2/16, 10:05 AM, "Steven Dake (stdake)" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On 4/2/16, 10:01 AM, "Jeremy Stanley" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 2016-04-02 16:13:28 +0000 (+0000), Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: >>> [...] >>>> I feel as though we are not permitted to participate in the >>>> marketing that takes place on the releases website >>> [...] >>> >>> I'll refrain from commenting on the rest since I'm not a member of >>> the release team, but I *seriously* hope we've not created a >>> "marketing" portal simply by way of tracking version numbers, >>> changelogs and release schedules. I have a feeling few (if any) of >>> the release team wants to get into the marketing business and I'm >>> happy to help do whatever is in my power to neuter the "marketing >>> potential" for releases.openstack.org so it can be viewed simply as >>> a source of _objective_ technical data. >>> -- >> >> It is objective technical data, but atm we are excluded, and people look >> at that objective technical data (like marketing and sales folks) to make >> decisions, so it is by its very nature a marketing resource as well. If >> we are excluded, sales and marketing folks that make decisions about >> OpenStack deployments may come along and say "not on the website, not >> legitimate". > > release:independent projects are rendered on this website [1], and ttx's > review comment was more to put kolla in releases:independent of the > releases repo rather then the mitaka location [1]. I misunderstood ttx's > comments to mean we were completely excluded which is not the case.
Right, we just need it filed under the right directory. > > That said, release:cycle-with-milestones is still what we want :) The model change can be approved and applied to Newton. During Newton we’ll figure out how to communicate about projects that have changed their tags — we don’t want to rewrite history for old releases but we don’t want it to be hard for users to find full project history. I have some ideas to handle it but I’m waiting until after the summit to implement them. Doug > > I'd ask people cut me a little slack on this, I am new to the > openstack/releases repository ;) > > [1] http://releases.openstack.org/independent.html > [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/297976/ >> >> Regards >> -steve >> >>> >>> Jeremy Stanley >>> >>> _________________________________________________________________________ >>> _ >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>> Unsubscribe: >>> [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
