No trouble. Yes, the config changes should be picked up automatically. You 
can't edit those files in the book directly, as a script writes them. That's 
why your change would have been declined.

Thanks for asking the question, though :)

L

On 24/04/16 11:12, ZhiQiang Fan wrote:
> Hi Lana,
> 
> Thank you for explaining it! 
> 
> Yes, I noticed that the DocImpact bug track now has shifted to project its 
> own, that why I submit a change by using the tool in openstack-doc-tools, but 
> that change is disagreed by a doc core. Meanwhile I also find that there is 
> rarely change merged for config reference update.
> 
> So I want to know is the config reference automatically updated so no more 
> individual commit is required?
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Lana Brindley <openst...@lanabrindley.com 
> <mailto:openst...@lanabrindley.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi ZhiQiang,
> 
>     I am not sure I understand your question. The only change to DocImpact is 
> that now the bug is created in the project's bug queue, not OpenStack 
> manuals. There is no other automation for DocImpact.
> 
>     For the config ref, there is a script that we run to get any new changes. 
> That will happen whether or not there is a DocImpact bug.
> 
>     Does that answer your question?
> 
>     Thanks,
>     Lana
> 
>     On 23/04/16 19:00, ZhiQiang Fan wrote:
>     > Hi Doc Team,
>     >
>     > I want to know the recent status of DocImpact tag, is it deprecated for 
> config option changes now? If it's true, then what the workflow for config 
> reference now, any hint or link?
>     >
>     > Previously, when a patch has impact to document, including config 
> option changes, I usually ask contributors to add a DocImpact, hence there 
> will be a bug track the document issue.
>     >
>     > Recently, a patch lands in Ceilometer which adds two new options, and 
> Ceilometer receives the auto created document bug. However, when I submit a 
> patch to openstack-manuals to fix it, I was told by a core that such change 
> is not needed any more, I searched latest merged patch in openstack-manuals 
> and found what he said is true, but still don't know why and what action I 
> should follow in Ceilometer/Aodh projects
>     >
>     > Thank you very much!
>     >
>     > ZhiQiang Fan
>     >
>     >
>     > 
> __________________________________________________________________________
>     > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>     > Unsubscribe: 
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe 
> <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>     > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>     >
> 
>     --
>     Lana Brindley
>     Technical Writer
>     Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
>     http://lanabrindley.com
> 
> 
>     __________________________________________________________________________
>     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>     Unsubscribe: 
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe 
> <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 

-- 
Lana Brindley
Technical Writer
Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
http://lanabrindley.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to