On 05/04/2016 08:21 AM, Mehdi Abaakouk wrote:
Hi,
That said, I agree with Mehdi that *most* RPC calls throughout OpenStack,
not being idempotent, should not use process-then-ack.
That why I think we must not call this RPC. And the new API should be
clear the expected idempotent of the application callbacks.
Thoughts from folks (mistral and oslo)?
Also, I was not at the Summit, should I conclude the Tooz+taskflow
approach (that ensure the idempotent of the application within the
library API) have not been accepted by mistral folks ?
Taskflow is pretty opinionated about the whole application design. We
can't use it in ironic-inspector, but we also need process-then-ack
semantics for our HA work.
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
