I update [1] to auto delete dhcp port if there is no other ports. But after the dhcp port is deleted, the dhcp service is not usable. I can resume the dhcp service by adding another subnet, but I don't think it is a good way. Do we need to consider bind dhcp port to another segment when deleting the existing one?
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/317358 HongHui Xiao(肖宏辉) PMP® From: Carl Baldwin <[email protected]> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List <[email protected]> Date: 05/18/2016 11:50 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][ML2][Routed Networks] On May 17, 2016 2:18 PM, "Kevin Benton" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >I kind of think it makes sense to require evacuating a segment of its ports before deleting it. > > Ah, I left out an important assumption I was making. We also need to auto delete the DHCP port as the segment is deleted. I was thinking this will be basically be like the delete_network case where we will auto remove the network owned ports. I can go along with that. Thanks for the clarification. Carl __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
