I would vote for POSM - "Puppet OpenStack Modules" -- Best regards, Sergii Golovatiuk, Skype #golserge IRC #holser
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Cody Herriges <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Jun 1, 2016, at 5:56 AM, Dmitry Tantsur <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 06/01/2016 02:20 PM, Jason Guiditta wrote: > >> On 01/06/16 18:49 +0800, Xingchao Yu wrote: > >>> Hi, everyone: > >>> > >>> Do we need to give a abbreviation for PuppetOpenstack project? B/C > >>> it's really a long words when I introduce this project to people or > >>> writng article about it. > >>> > >>> How about POM(PuppetOpenstack Modules) or POP(PuppetOpenstack > >>> Project) ? > >>> > >>> I would like +1 for POM. > >>> Just an idea, please feel free to give your comment :D > >>> Xingchao Yu > >> > >> For rdo and osp, we package it as 'openstack-puppet-modules', or OPM > >> for short. > > > > I definitely love POM as it reminds me of pomeranians :) but I agree > that OPM will probably be easier recognizable. > > The project's official name is in fact "Puppet OpenStack" so OPM would be > kinda confusing. I'd put my vote on POP because it is closer to the actual > definition of an acronym[1], which I generally find easier to remember over > all when it comes to the shortening of long phrases. > > [1] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/acronym > > -- > Cody > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
