Sorry that was a typo, it should read:

> Note that the MAC addresses of gtrp and dtrp will be the same on each OVN 
> Join Network, but because they are in different branches of the network 
> topology it doesn’t matter.
Amitabha

> On Jun 7, 2016, at 4:39 PM, Bhalachandra Banavalikar 
> <bhal.banavali...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> Can you please provide more details on lgrp and lip ports (last bullet in 
> section 1)?
> 
> Thanks,
> Bhal
> 
> <graycol.gif>Amitabha Biswas ---06/07/2016 01:56:23 PM---This proposal 
> outlines the modifications needed in networking-ovn (addresses 
> https://bugs.launchpad <https://bugs.launchpad/>.
> 
> From: Amitabha Biswas <azbis...@gmail.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Cc: Chandra Sekhar Vejendla/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS
> Date: 06/07/2016 01:56 PM
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-ovn] Integration with OVN NAT 
> gateway (Proposal)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This proposal outlines the modifications needed in networking-ovn (addresses 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-ovn/+bug/1551717 
> <https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-ovn/+bug/1551717>) to provide Floating 
> IP (FIP) and SNAT using the L3 gateway router patches.
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/624312/ 
> <http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/624312/> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/624313/ 
> <http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/624312/> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/624314/ 
> <http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/624312/> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/624315/ 
> <http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/624312/> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/629607/ 
> <http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/629607/>
> 
> Diagram:
> 
> +-------+ +-------+
> | NET 1 | | NET 2 |
> +-------+ +-------+
> | |
> | ********* |
> | ** ** |
> | ** * * ** |
> +---RP1 * DR * RP2 --+
> ** * * **
> ** ** 
> ********* 
> DTRP (168.254.128.2)
> |
> |
> |
> +------------------+
> | Transit Network |
> | 169.254.128.0/30 |
> +------------------+
> |
> |
> |
> |
> GTRP (169.254.128.1)
> ******* 
> ** ** 
> ** * * ** +------------------+
> * GW *-----------------| Provider Network |
> ** * * ** +------------------+
> ** ** 
> ******* 
> 
> New Entities:
> OVN Join/Transit Networks
> One per Neutron Router - /30 address space with only 2 ports for e.g. 
> 169.254.128.0/30
> Created when an external gateway is added to a router.
> One extra datapath per router with an External Gateway.
> (Alternate option - One Transit Network in a deployment, IPAM becomes a 
> headache - Not discussed here).
> Prevent Neutron from using that /30 address space. Specify in networking-ovn 
> conf file.
> Create 1 new “Join” neutron network (to represent all Join OVN Networks) in 
> the networking-ovn.
> Note that it may be possible to replace the Join/Transit network using Router 
> Peering in later versions (not discussed here).
> Allocate 2 ports in the Join network in the networking-ovn plugin.
> Logical Gateway Transit Router Port (gtrp), 169.254.128.1
> Logical Distributed Transit Router Port (dtrp), 169.254.128.2
> Note that Neutron only sees 1 Join network with 2 ports; OVN sees a replica 
> of this Join network as a new Logical Switch for each Gateway Router. The 
> mapping of OVN Logical Switch(es) Join(s) to Gateway Router is discussed in 
> OVN (Default) Gateway Routers below.
> Note that the MAC addresses of gtrp and dtrp will be the same on each OVN 
> Join Network, but because they are in different branches of the network 
> topology it doesn’t matter.
> OVN (Default) Gateway Routers:
> One per Neutron Router.
> 2 ports
> Logical Gateway Transit Router Port (gtrp), 169.254.128.1 (same for each OVN 
> Join network).
> External/Provider Router Port (legwrp), this is allocated by neutron.
> Scheduling - The current OVN gateway proposal relies on the CMS/nbctl to 
> decide on which hypervisor (HV) to schedule a particular gateway router.
> A setting on the chassis (new external_id key or a new column) that allows 
> the hypervisor admin to specify that a chassis can or cannot be used to host 
> a gateway router (similar to a network node in OpenStack). Default - Allow 
> (for compatibility purposes).
> The networking-ovn plugin picks up the list of “candidate” chassis from the 
> Southbound DB and uses an existing scheduling algorithm
> Use a simple random.choice i.e. ChanceScheduler (Version 1)
> Tap into the neutron’s LeastRouterScheduler - but that requires the 
> networking-ovn (or some a hacked up version of the L3 agent) to imitate the 
> L3 agent running on various network nodes.
> Populate the SNAT and DNAT columns in the logical router table. This is under 
> review in OVS - http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-June/072169.html 
> <http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-June/072169.html>
> Create static routing entry in the gateway router to route tenant bound 
> traffic to the distributed logical router.ar gate
> 
> Existing Entities:
> Distributed Logical Routers:
> Set the default gateway of the distributed logical router to the IP Address 
> of the corresponding Logical Gateway Transit Router Port (169.254.128.1).
> 
> It would be good to get some feedback on this strategy. Guru mentioned that 
> he saw a need for ARP response across multiple gateway routers, we don’t see 
> that requirement in this design/use-case.
> 
> Thanks
> Amitabha (azbiswas) and Chandra (chandrav)
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 
> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to