Hello all,

I have recently came across some missing constants in neutron-lib and sent
a patch but
i wanted to try and understand the scope of the lib.

I see that the Neutron lib consist of many definitions which are actually
part of the reference
implementation and are not really "generic" Neutron parts.

I am wondering if this is the right approach, especially since i think an
end goal is to split
between the two (some day..)

My suggestion would be to at least split these two in the neutron-lib, but
maybe
i miss understood the scope of the lib

Gal.
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to