Gal Sagie <gal.sa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > I have recently came across some missing constants in neutron-lib and sent > a patch but i wanted to try and understand the scope of the lib. > > I see that the Neutron lib consist of many definitions which are actually > part of the reference implementation and are not really "generic" Neutron > parts.
Can you give specific examples of 'not really generic' constants? > I am wondering if this is the right approach, especially since i think an > end goal is to split between the two (some day..) > > My suggestion would be to at least split these two in the neutron-lib, but > maybe > i miss understood the scope of the lib __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
