On 6/17/16, 11:38 AM, "Jeremy Stanley" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 2016-06-17 18:04:25 +0000 (+0000), Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: >[...] >> The technical committee has set precedent that competition is >> acceptable in the "outer ring" of services (i.e. The TC doesn't >> want Big Tent projects competing with nova for example but >> deployment is fair game). I agree with that decision completely. >> However, I can't help but wonder wouldn't this require at-least a >> Fuel mission change to the governance repository? >[...] > >His original message explained it: > > "As for the governance - Fuel CCP will be just a separated > experimental project under OpenStack namespace with own specs > and core team. The nearest example of the same governance is 3rd > party Fuel plugin done not by Mirantis." > >So basically it's not officially part of Fuel, and isn't (currently) >even trying to officially be part of OpenStack. >-- Jeremy Cool thanks for the info. Sergey please disregard the commentary about mission statement - I apologize for misunderstanding your original intent. Regards -steve > >Jeremy Stanley > >__________________________________________________________________________ >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
