I think we could at least fix-up schema validation. On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Matt Riedemann <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 7/6/2016 9:37 AM, Timofei Durakov wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> there are several patches in a tempest that improves micro >> versions coverage for Nova REST API: >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/337598 >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/338248 >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/287605 >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/338256 >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/233176 >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/327191 >> >> The purpose of this thread is to align our efforts in merging these and >> also ask other contributors to join this activity, as it will improve >> nova tempest coverage. >> >> >> Timofey. >> >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > Are these all needed in Tempest? We don't need 100% nova microversion REST > API coverage in Tempest if there are things that we can test inside nova, > like in the functional tests. The only thing we don't have in nova is the > response schema validation. For the most part I only ask for a microversion > test in Tempest when it requires other services like cinder or neutron, or > it hits new behavior in the virt drivers. > > -- > > Thanks, > > Matt Riedemann > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
