On 12.07.2016 19:46, Augustina Ragwitz wrote: > I like the idea of having a list because it makes it easy for people to > see what's up for review. Anything that allows people to easily point > and click will increase visibility and participation. I also prefer the > list maintenance be as automagic as possible so the burden doesn't fall > on one or two people and thus risk it getting out of date. > > I like #3 but I worry about the comments getting spammy if things are > dropped from and added to the list repeatedly. Would tagging the bugs in > Launchpad work? We can easily remove tags in Launchpad, it's a > query-able list, and the reviewer would immediately have some context. >
Yeah, the easy access is key IMO. Some people also like to use CLI tools like gerrty [1] which makes it necessary that the query is executed against Gerrit. In the nova-bugs-team meeting some minutes ago we also discussed that we could have a query which checks: * starred changes * by certain people * "closes-bug" in the commit message That allows some kind of control which changes will be in that list. [1] https://github.com/openstack/gertty [2] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_bugs_team/2016/nova_bugs_team.2016-07-12-17.59.log.html -- Regards, Markus Zoeller (markus_z) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev