On 2016-07-13 09:56:37 +0200 (+0200), Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui wrote: [...] > Gerrit comments are lost when the patch get merged, we may want to > provide some stats from these tags in future that's why I think commit > message is better.
It's not true at all that Gerrit comments are lost when the patch gets merged. You can continue to query comments in Gerrit for merged changes, or even selectively limit to, e.g., status:merged or status:abandoned or whatever when generating your stats. > Also if we only change commit messages, all of the gate is > re-executed ? [...] It depends on your project configuration in Gerrit and Zuul as to whether votes are reset and which jobs are (re)run. We're also hoping to be able to detect commit message edits explicitly in a future version of Zuul and be able to have specific handling for that too (right now you're limited to deciding which jobs run based on filename patterns appearing in the diff instead). -- Jeremy Stanley __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
