On Mon, Jul 18 2016, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Thus why I think the starting of the architecture working group is a good > thing; because I have a believe that people are forgetting among all of this > that such a group holds a lot of the keys to the kingdom (whether u, the > reader, want to admit that or not is well the readers problem) in openstack > (sorry and no disrespect to independent folks & contributors), but most of us > work for large companies that have architects (and leads) and if those > architects (and leads) can get together cross-company to aggregate and (agree > on) and solve actual problems then that really is IMHO the only way to keep > our > projects healthy (assuming we can even do that at this stage).
I think it is a bit naive to think any working group is going to fix architectural problems. You know first hand what happened¹ with the Nova service group and tooz for example. ¹ Nothing. -- Julien Danjou // Free Software hacker // https://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
