On Tue, Jul 19 2016, Clint Byrum wrote: > Perhaps if we form and start working together as a group, we can disect > why nothing happened, build consensus on the most important thing to do > next, and actually fix some architectural problems. The social structure > that teams have is a huge part of the deadlock we find ourselves in > with certain controversial changes. The idea is to unroll the dependency > loop and start _somewhere_ rather than where a lot of these efforts die: > starting _everywhere_.
I agree with your analysis, but I fail to see how e.g. a group of people X stating that Y should work this way in Cinder is going to achieve any change if nobody from Cinder is in X from the beginning. This is basically what seems to happen in many [working] groups as far as I can see. -- Julien Danjou ;; Free Software hacker ;; https://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
