On 09/08/2016 01:27 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
What's up in upgrades? 1) Undercloud: Mitaka to Newton We just approved a patch in openstack-infra/tripleo-ci that test undercloud upgrades. I don't think we should make it vote as for now it's quite experimental. Though I'm wondering if we should move it to the check pipeline as non-voting (currently in experimental queue). This is a first iteration and if you plan to upgrade your undercloud, you'll still have to do manual steps that we do in tripleo-ci. They are described here: https://github.com/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/blob/41e8560cf3d313f2be69df64e4c95a3240dfa402/scripts/tripleo.sh#L554-L577 We need to decide where to put these bits: in tripleoclient? in instack-undercloud? Let's talk about it.
I think we already did: https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/specs/newton/undercloud-upgrade.html
There are details about where various bits of the implementation should live because it turns out that is pretty fundamental to the design of the upgrade process.
2) Overcloud: Mitaka to Newton matbu and myself are working together on a CI job that will test the upgrade of an undercloud + overcloud from Mitaka to Newton. Work is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/364859 and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/323750/ (both patches are going to merge together so we have one single patch for review). The idea is to use multinode job for now as a first iteration, with the simplest scenario possible so we can easily iterate later. 3) Overcloud: Newton to Newton I'm working on a simple patch that would test updates from Newton to Newton: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351330/ like we had with OVB jobs but this time using multinode. Any feedback, help, is highly welcome.
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
