On 09/09/2016 12:42 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 4:18 PM, David Moreau Simard <[email protected]> wrote: >> How long does the upgrade job take ? > undercloud upgrade is a matter of 10 min max. > overcloud upgrade will be much more, I don't have metrics right now. > matbu maybe? It really depend on the infra which run the upgrade. I don't know much about the upstream infra but on my local box, with a SSD, 8 cores and 32Go of RAM, It could take around 1h30 2hours for a full upgrade. On centos ci infra and with RDO, some jobs can takes 4hours or so ...
I'm really curious to see how long a full upgrade will take with upstream. Right now, the full upgrade job didn't go far from the controller upgrade (step 2). AFAIK, the timeout in upstream is 3 hours minus 10 minutes ... I think if we keep a 2 nodes deployment with only pacemaker, it would be enough... I will keep you in touch of my progress here.. But, even if the jobs takes 2 or 3 hours to vote, I think it would be a real huge gain for the tripleo work. >> David Moreau Simard >> Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO >> >> dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter] >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Emilien Macchi <[email protected]> wrote: >>> What's up in upgrades? >>> >>> 1) Undercloud: Mitaka to Newton >>> >>> We just approved a patch in openstack-infra/tripleo-ci that test >>> undercloud upgrades. >>> I don't think we should make it vote as for now it's quite >>> experimental. Though I'm wondering if we should move it to the check >>> pipeline as non-voting (currently in experimental queue). >>> >>> This is a first iteration and if you plan to upgrade your undercloud, >>> you'll still have to do manual steps that we do in tripleo-ci. They >>> are described here: >>> https://github.com/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/blob/41e8560cf3d313f2be69df64e4c95a3240dfa402/scripts/tripleo.sh#L554-L577 >>> >>> We need to decide where to put these bits: in tripleoclient? in >>> instack-undercloud? Let's talk about it. >>> >>> >>> 2) Overcloud: Mitaka to Newton >>> >>> matbu and myself are working together on a CI job that will test the >>> upgrade of an undercloud + overcloud from Mitaka to Newton. >>> Work is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/364859 and >>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/323750/ (both patches are going to >>> merge together so we have one single patch for review). >>> The idea is to use multinode job for now as a first iteration, with >>> the simplest scenario possible so we can easily iterate later. >>> >>> >>> 3) Overcloud: Newton to Newton >>> I'm working on a simple patch that would test updates from Newton to >>> Newton: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351330/ like we had with OVB >>> jobs but this time using multinode. >>> >>> >>> Any feedback, help, is highly welcome. >>> -- >>> Emilien Macchi >>> >>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>> Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
