On Fri, Sep 9, 2016, at 12:58 PM, John Davidge wrote: > Yes, that's a part of what I'm saying. After writing my first reply I > decided there wasn't much point talking about the problem without > proposing a solution, so I wrote one[2]. Essentially it boils down to: > > * Abolish The Big Tent > * Define OpenStack as its core components > * Create a new place for complimentary projects to live > * Bring back Stackforge > > The link[2] below goes into a lot more detail, and I'd love to hear > feedback from all interested parties. > > >My vote is definitely for something #2-like, as I've said before and on > >the review, I believe OpenStack should be a "cloud toolkit" composed of > >well-scoped and limited services in the vein of the UNIX model of do one > >thing and do it well. I believe that vendors and cloud providers should > >be able to choose services and tools from this OpenStack cloud toolkit > >to build clouds, cloud products, and products that utilize OpenStack > >service APIs to please customers. > > So it seems we both agree that the current definition doesn't fit, even > if > we don’t agree on the solution :) > > Thanks, > > John > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/357260 > [2] > https://johndavidge.wordpress.com/2016/09/09/mr-openstack-tear-down-this-te > nt/
FWIW stackforge didn't go away. We just stopped using a separate Gerrit prefix for those projects. You do not have to be part of the big tent to be hosted on review.openstack.org. See http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/stackforge.html Clark __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev