+1 for the proposal. What about the codes for Pod operation? It seems that both Tricircle and Trio2o need these codes. We submit patches to these two projects separately?
Zhiyuan joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com>于2016年9月18日周日 下午4:17写道： > hello, team, > > Trio2o git repository is ready now: https://github.com/openstack/trio2o > > The repository inherited all files and commit messages from Tricircle. > > It's now the time start to do the tricircle splitting: a blue print is > registere for Tricircle cleaning: > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tricircle/+spec/make-tricircle-dedicated-for-networking-automation-across-neutron > .There are lots of documentation work to do. Please review these doc in > the BP, thanks. > > There are some proposal for patches during the splitting: > > 1. For patch which is already in review status, let's review it in > Tricircle (no matter it's for Trio2o or Tricircle), after it's get merged, > then port it to Trio2o. After all patches get merged, let's have a last tag > for Tricircle to cover both gateway and networking automation function. > Then the cleaning will be done in Tricircle to make Tricircle as a project > for networking automation only > 2. For new patch which is only applicable to Trio2o, I propose that we > submit such patches in Trio2o only, no need to submit in Tricircle. > > Would like to know your thoughts on the splitting. > > Best Regards > Chaoyi Huang(joehuang) > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
