On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Julien Danjou wrote: > > > Considering the split of Ceilometer in subprojects (Aodh and Panko) > > during those last cycles, and the increasing usage of Gnocchi, I am > > starting to wonder if it makes sense to maintain the legacy Ceilometer > > API. > > No surprise, as I've been saying this for a long time, but yeah, I think > the API and storage should be deprecated. > > The data gathering (and to some extent transforming) parts are the only > parts of ceilometer that are particularly unique so it would be good > for those to be preserved.
That works for me - we removed the API and storage containers from our Kubernetes deployment of Ceilometer some time ago. We use the collector's HTTP Dispatcher to send events and metrics to our billing database. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
