Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi folks,
A few hours ago a governance change [1] has been approved by TC members.
This means that from now on, the efforts for Load Balancing as a Service
efforts rest officially in the hands of the Octavia PTL and the Octavia
core team.
I will work with the help of the respective core teams to implement a
smooth transition. My suggestion at this point is for any ML
communication that pertain LBaaS issues to include [octavia] tag on the
email subject.
Please do not hesitate to reach out for any questions and/or
clarifications.
Cheers,
Armando
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/313056/
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Should we also move all neutron lbaas-tagged bugs to octavia in LP? And
kill the ‘lbaas’ tag from doc/source/policies/bugs.rst?
Ihar
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
