On 12/01/2016 08:54 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi folks,

A few hours ago a governance change [1] has been approved by TC members. This
means that from now on, the efforts for Load Balancing as a Service efforts
rest officially in the hands of the Octavia PTL and the Octavia core team.

I will work with the help of the respective core teams to implement a smooth
transition. My suggestion at this point is for any ML communication that
pertain LBaaS issues to include [octavia] tag on the email subject.

Please do not hesitate to reach out for any questions and/or clarifications.


[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/313056/

Should we also move all neutron lbaas-tagged bugs to octavia in LP? And kill the
‘lbaas’ tag from doc/source/policies/bugs.rst?

Yes.  I added the lbaas bugs.rst tag removal to
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/404872/ already. Can someone from Octavia close and/or move-over any remaining lbaas bugs? I only see three at



OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Reply via email to