On 2016-12-05 20:45:08 +0000 (+0000), Kendall Nelson wrote:
[...]
> Allowing Teams Based on Vendor-specific Drivers [10]
> -
> Option 1: https://review.openstack.org/403834 - Proprietary driver dev
> is unlevel
> -
> Option 2: https://review.openstack.org/403836 - Driver development can
> be level
> -
> Option 3: https://review.openstack.org/403839 - Level playing fields,
> except drivers
> -
> Option 4: https://review.openstack.org/403829
> <https://review.openstack.org/403829> - establish a new "driver team"
> concept
> -
> Thierry prefers this option
> -
> Option 5: https://review.openstack.org/403830 - add resolution requiring
> teams to accept driver contributions
> -
> One of Flavio’s preferred options
> -
> Option 6: https://review.openstack.org/403826 - add a resolution
> allowing teams based on vendor-specific drivers
> -
> Flavio’s other preferred option
[...]
Worth noting, these map to options 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 from Doug's
summary. His option #3 is missing above, which was:
https://review.openstack.org/403838 - Stop requiring a level
playing field
That probably explains the numbering skew between the two summaries.
--
Jeremy Stanley
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
