Gave the wrong link for the HTML verison before. Sorry! Actual HTML version: http://www.openstack.org/blog/2016/12/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-november-26-december-2/
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:55 PM Jeremy Stanley <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2016-12-05 20:45:08 +0000 (+0000), Kendall Nelson wrote: > [...] > > Allowing Teams Based on Vendor-specific Drivers [10] > > - > > Option 1: https://review.openstack.org/403834 - Proprietary driver > dev > > is unlevel > > - > > Option 2: https://review.openstack.org/403836 - Driver development > can > > be level > > - > > Option 3: https://review.openstack.org/403839 - Level playing fields, > > except drivers > > - > > Option 4: https://review.openstack.org/403829 > > <https://review.openstack.org/403829> - establish a new "driver team" > > concept > > - > > Thierry prefers this option > > - > > Option 5: https://review.openstack.org/403830 - add resolution > requiring > > teams to accept driver contributions > > - > > One of Flavio’s preferred options > > - > > Option 6: https://review.openstack.org/403826 - add a resolution > > allowing teams based on vendor-specific drivers > > - > > Flavio’s other preferred option > [...] > > Worth noting, these map to options 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 from Doug's > summary. His option #3 is missing above, which was: > > https://review.openstack.org/403838 - Stop requiring a level > playing field > > That probably explains the numbering skew between the two summaries. > -- > Jeremy Stanley > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
