On 18:16 Jan 24, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > Hey, Flavio :) Thanks for your questions! > > As you said currently only Nokia's adopting Glare for its own platform, but > if we talk about OpenStack, that I believe Mistral will start to use it > soon. > In my opinion Glare's adoption is low due to the fact that the project is > not included under Big Tent. I think it will be changed soon, because now > I'm finishing Glare v1 API proposal, and when it's done we will apply under > BT. > > About Glance v2 API - as I said they are +- the same with several cosmetic > differences (in Glance status is called 'queued', in Glare we renamed it to > 'drafted', and so on). For this reason I'm going to implement a middleware, > that will provide a full Image API v2 for Glare (even with unnecessary > '/v2' prefix) and glance clients will be able to communicate with it as > with Glance. It's definitely doable and we can discuss it more detailed > during the PTG.
Both Flavio and Doug asked you to expand on the issues with the Glance API. Can you please expand on that. -- Mike Perez
pgp07yDGWQQEK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
