Please find my comments for bn and pa inline. Thanks Jimidar (Amandeep Singh)
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Andreas Jaeger <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08/27/2015 06:10 PM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:17 AM, Andreas Jaeger <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Could we also revise languages and language codes? >>> >>> I think we should prefer Country-independent languages over country ones. >>> >>> So, we should prefer German ("de") over German in Germany ("de_DE") and >>> German in Austria ("de_AT"). >>> >>> In case where we have country specific ones - like pl_PL -, can we rename >>> them to country independent ones - like pl? >>> >>> When asking for new languages, we should then get the independent one in >>> first and only after consolidation with the existing team create a >>> specific >>> one. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >> >> I can't directly speak to the conversation that led to this list, but >> StevenK and Daisy came up with the following list, which seems to go >> by what you suggest: >> >> ar >> as >> bg-BG >> > > Rename to bg? > > bn-IN >> > > Rename to bn? > Bangla is used in two different countries. Bengali in India. and Bangla in Bangladesh. Can not generalize the term for it. > brx >> ca >> cs >> de >> el >> en-AU >> en-GB >> es >> es-MX >> fi-FI >> > > Rename to fi? > > fil >> fr >> gu >> he >> hi >> hu >> id >> it >> ja >> ka-GE >> > > Rename to ka? > > kn >> ko-KR >> > > Can we rename to ko, please? > > kok >> ks >> mai >> mni >> mr >> ne >> nl-NL >> > > Rename to nl? > > pa-IN >> > > Rename to pa? Punjabi (pa) has two scripts, one is Gurmukhi used in Indian side of Punjab and the other is Shahmukhi (Urdu) used in Pakistan's Punjab, so renaming to a generalized name wont do the justice to both entirely different scripts. > > pl-PL >> > > Can we rename the above to pl, please? > > pt >> pt-BR >> ru >> sl-SI >> > > Rename to sl? > > sr >> ta >> te-IN >> > > Rename to te? > > tr-TR >> > > Rename to tr? > > ur >> vi-VN >> > > Rename to vi? > > zh-CN >> zh-TW >> >> Copied from this pastebin that StevenK shared last night, in case it >> expires: http://paste.openstack.org/show/429137/ >> >> > Background: We get *lots* of request on transifex for new languages, for > example today for pl. There's right now no reason to have both pl and > pl-PL. I'd like us to standardize here... > > Andreas > -- > Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi > SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 > > > _______________________________________________ > Openstack-i18n mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
