On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:12:11AM -0800, James E. Blair wrote: > Paul Belanger <[email protected]> writes: > > > So, I was thinking about this the other day, what would be needed to make > > zuul-server more redundant. Since we can scale out merges, why not the > > server > > part too. This should help mitigate issues (eg: memory leaks, crash). > > > > I was thinking something like memcache / redis / some other tool to > > externalize > > queues would be needed. But obviously, this adds additional overhead to > > running > > zuul. > > > > It would be interesting to see if ansible-launchers could be scaled out too > > over > > multiple hosts. Since we'd be pushing more SSH connections from zuul now. > > The launchers are absolutely a scalable component. > Nice! Time to update my local zuul to v3. > -Jim > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
