Paul Belanger <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:12:11AM -0800, James E. Blair wrote: >> Paul Belanger <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > So, I was thinking about this the other day, what would be needed to make >> > zuul-server more redundant. Since we can scale out merges, why not the >> > server >> > part too. This should help mitigate issues (eg: memory leaks, crash). >> > >> > I was thinking something like memcache / redis / some other tool to >> > externalize >> > queues would be needed. But obviously, this adds additional overhead to >> > running >> > zuul. >> > >> > It would be interesting to see if ansible-launchers could be scaled out >> > too over >> > multiple hosts. Since we'd be pushing more SSH connections from zuul now. >> >> The launchers are absolutely a scalable component. >> > Nice! Time to update my local zuul to v3.
It's still under development; it needs hackers more than testers at this point. -Jim _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
