Absolutely. On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:25 AM, George Shuklin <george.shuk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nice page. > > Is jenkins-debian-glue with ubuntu './debian' part is counted as valid way > to package openstack? They even have separate repo for patches and > debian-specific files (like control). > > > On 11/30/2014 04:38 PM, Michael Chapman wrote: > > I've started a wiki page here, please feel free to flesh it out with > more detail: > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Packaging/GenericTooling > > Looking at the OpenStack meetings page, the schedule is very packed with > Mondays being a little less loaded. How about 1500 UTC on Mondays? This > clashes with Satori and Zaqar, which I hope has minimal overlap with our > group. The #openstack-operators room would be an appropriate venue, but I > think we should move to one of the openstack meeting channels if the first > meeting proves useful and there is a desire for more. If we make our first > meeting on the 7th of December, that gives us plenty of time to list > discussion topics. > > Since I'm on the wrong side of the world, would anyone like to volunteer > to lead the discussion? I have created an agenda etherpad here, again feel > free to add things : > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-operators-meeting-071214-agenda > > I'd like to examine each of the tools to see which requirements they > don't satisfy, and what the shortest path to getting one that ticks every > (reasonable) box might be. > > - Michael > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Emrah Aslan <e.as...@logicom.com.tr> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Any progress on reduce the fragmentation ? >> >> Kind Regards >> >> Emrah ASLAN >> Cisco/Citrix System Engineer >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Değerli İş Ortaklarımız, >> Logicom kampanyaları , fırsat, duyuru ve stok bilgilerinin sizlere >> düzenli ulaşması için aşağıdaki linki tıklayarak e-mail adresinizi >> güncellemenizi rica ediyoruz. >> >> http://visitor.r20.constantcontact.com/manage/optin?v=001t9egDEMH10MEulnTu-Lzln0RXbiYIgR2HnLd_hpHmPb0K44ZxJOya0FvCOF3TI8c2qeErt1Xrn3PlZqntTSqiSTW40PTK2XQ8OlOUe4qYOE%3D >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Derek Higgins [mailto:der...@redhat.com] >> Sent: Friday, November 28, 2014 12:35 PM >> To: Jay Pipes; openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org >> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Operations project: Packaging >> >> On 27/11/14 15:06, Jay Pipes wrote: >> > On 11/24/2014 06:58 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: >> >> On 18/11/14 06:16, Michael Chapman wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >> >>> >> >>> Packaging was one of the biggest points of interest in the Friday >> >>> Paris meeting, and I'd like to use this thread to have a centralised >> >>> discussion and/or argument regarding whether there is a packaging >> >>> system that is flexible enough that we can adopt it as a community >> >>> and reduce the fragmentation. This conversation began in Paris, but >> >>> will likely continue for some time. >> >>> >> >>> The Friday session indicates that as operators we have common >> >>> requirements: >> >>> >> >>> A system that takes the sources from upstream projects and produces >> >>> artifacts (packages or images). >> >>> >> >>> There are numerous projects that have attempted to solve this problem. >> >>> Some are on stackforge, some live outside. If you are an author or a >> >>> user of one of these systems, please give your opinion. >> >> >> >> To throw another project into the mix, I've been working on building >> >> master packages with delorean[1] for a last few months(currently >> >> building for fedora but planning on adding more), the specs being >> >> uses are based off the RDO packaging. >> >> >> >> The plan we're slowly working towards will be to allow this packaging >> >> hopefully become the upstream of the RDO packaging for the released >> >> projects. We're also hoping to allow contributions from the whole RDO >> >> community via gerrithub [2]. >> >> >> >> If anybody is interested the packaging we are maintaining is on >> >> github[3], with a yum repository being created for every commit into >> >> the monitored openstack projects[4] >> >> >> >> So ya count me in for any discussions happening. >> >> >> >> [1] https://github.com/openstack-packages/delorean >> >> [2] https://review.gerrithub.io/ >> >> [3] https://github.com/openstack-packages >> >> [4] http://209.132.178.33/repos/report.html (DNS pending) >> > >> > Any reason stackforge wasn't chosen instead of another Github >> organization? >> >> While trying to figure out the process having it on a github org was an >> advantage for a number of reasons for example we started out with a small >> set of packaging repositories and added as needed, creating these is a lot >> quicker on github, adding stackforge repositories would have been slower, >> we've also renamed a couple of repositories and deleted others >> >> In future as things settle down and we get a better view of whats needed, >> I'm open to moving to stackforge. >> >> > >> > Best, >> > -jay >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > OpenStack-operators mailing list >> > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operator >> > s >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing > listOpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.orghttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
