On 12/15/2014 10:49 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
and ubuntu just put files
in proper places without changing configs.
Ahem... Ubuntu simply doesn't care much about config files. See what
they ship for Nova and Cinder. I wouldn't say "without changing configs"
in this case.
We using chef for
configuration, so ubuntu approach is better
It's not better or worse, it's exactly the same as for Debian, as the
Debian package will *never* change something you modified in a config
file, as per Debian policy (if they do, then it's a bug you shall report
to the tracker).
Thank you.
It's rather unexpected, but I'll take this in account for next
installation. I'm not a big fan of ubuntu maintanance policy (they
basically dropped it 2 month prior announced date), and I prefer use of
debian where possible. Now I see it's ok with openstack too, and it's
good. I think is some kind of implicit FUD, because I was absolutely
sure that Canonical/RH packaging and Debian is far in the tail of the
process. It is not true and I'm happy.
Anyway, I'm ready to help but have no idea how (within my limits).
Do you have any experience building 3rd party CIs on OpenStack infra?
Nope. I've only done stuff with debian-jenkins-glue. But I have some
experience on backporting patches from icehouse to havana (it still in
production and still need fixes). I can research/fix something specific
and local.
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
