On 1/28/15, 4:45 PM, "Mathieu Gagné" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 2015-01-28 6:30 PM, Tom Fifield wrote: >> On 29/01/15 07:28, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>> On 01/27/2015 11:00 PM, Tom Fifield wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Based on Gustavo's excellent work below, talking with many ops, and >>>> after a brief chats with Jeremey and a few other TC folks, here's what >>>> I'd propose as an end goal: >>>> >>>> * A git repository that has raw, sample configs in it for each project >>>> that will be automagically updated >>>> >>>> * Raw configs distributed in the tar files we make as part of the >>>>release >>>> >>>> Does that seem acceptable for us all? >>> >>> It is not. Since it has been already discuss, but we're still not >>>having >>> any counter point of argumentation, I shall repeat myself, until sanity >>> gets restored. >>> >>> You are still *not* addressing the main issue: the .sample config files >>> *must* match your environment and the version of the different libs on >>> which a given service is going to run. Therefore, any attempt to go >>>back >>> to the previous situation (where we have already pre-built config >>>files) >>> can be considered a grave regression. >> >> Actually, many folks I spoke to didn't really care about this. >> >> > >I'm very well aware that configs "exported" by 3rd party libraries might >not reflect exactly what I have in my own environment. This is a >downside many operators are willing to accept to get back a simple >sample config file. > >Many operators (myself included, of course) used to rely on the sample >config file found in the repository of the project and it did a *great* >job. Now it's gone and all proposed/alternative solutions just doesn't >cut it for us *operators*, not packagers, developers, etc. Agreed completely. I know it wpn¹t be 100% perfect, but its 95% and right now I have 0%. (please ignore the cruft below)... This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
