John, I believe that backlog should be different much simpler then specs.
Imho Operators don't have time / don't want to write long long specs and analyze how they are aligned with specs or moreover how they should be implemented and how they impact performance/security/scalability. They want just to provide feedback and someday get it implemented/fixed. In Rally we chose different way called "feature request". The process is the same as for specs, but template is much simpler. Here is the page: https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/feature_requests.html And here is the sample of feature request: https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/feature_request/launch_specific_benchmark.html Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Boris Pavlovic <[email protected]> wrote: > John, > > I believe that backlog should be different much simpler then specs. > > Imho Operators don't have time / don't want to write long long specs and > analyze how they are aligned with specs > or moreover how they should be implemented and how they impact > performance/security/scalability. They want > just to provide feedback and someday get it implemented/fixed. > > In Rally we chose different way called "feature request". > The process is the same as for specs, but template is much simpler. > > Here is the page: > https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/feature_requests.html > > And here is the sample of feature request: > > https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/feature_request/launch_specific_benchmark.html > > > > Best regards, > Boris Pavlovic > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 8:47 PM, John Garbutt <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I was talking with Matt (VW) about how best some large deployment >> working sessions could send their requirements to Nova. >> >> As an operator, if you have a problem that needs fixing or use case >> that needs addressing, a great way of raising that issue with the >> developer community is a "Backlog" nova-spec. >> >> You can read more about Nova's backlog specs here: >> http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/backlog/ >> >> Any questions, comments or ideas, please do let me know. >> >> Thanks, >> John >> >> PS >> In Kilo we formally started accepting "backlog specs", although we are >> only just getting the first of these submitted now. There is actually >> a patch to fix up how they get rendered: >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182793/2 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
