On 05/14/15 21:04, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
John,
I believe that backlog should be different much simpler then specs.
Imho Operators don't have time / don't want to write long long specs
and analyze how they are aligned with specs
or moreover how they should be implemented and how they impact
performance/security/scalability. They want
just to provide feedback and someday get it implemented/fixed.
In Rally we chose different way called "feature request".
The process is the same as for specs, but template is much simpler.
Bravo!!!!
Can we please have this as a default template and the default way to
allow Operators to submit a feature request for EVERY and ALL the
OpenStack projects ??
Here is the page:
https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/feature_requests.html
And here is the sample of feature request:
https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/feature_request/launch_specific_benchmark.html
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Boris Pavlovic
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
John,
I believe that backlog should be different much simpler then specs.
Imho Operators don't have time / don't want to write long long
specs and analyze how they are aligned with specs
or moreover how they should be implemented and how they impact
performance/security/scalability. They want
just to provide feedback and someday get it implemented/fixed.
In Rally we chose different way called "feature request".
The process is the same as for specs, but template is much simpler.
Here is the page:
https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/feature_requests.html
And here is the sample of feature request:
https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/feature_request/launch_specific_benchmark.html
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 8:47 PM, John Garbutt
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,
I was talking with Matt (VW) about how best some large deployment
working sessions could send their requirements to Nova.
As an operator, if you have a problem that needs fixing or use
case
that needs addressing, a great way of raising that issue with the
developer community is a "Backlog" nova-spec.
You can read more about Nova's backlog specs here:
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/backlog/
Any questions, comments or ideas, please do let me know.
Thanks,
John
PS
In Kilo we formally started accepting "backlog specs",
although we are
only just getting the first of these submitted now. There is
actually
a patch to fix up how they get rendered:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182793/2
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
--
Best Regards,
Maish Saidel-Keesing
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
