On 05/17/2015 04:33 PM, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote:
Probably the solution is not selected to be backported because:

  * It’s an intrusive change
  * Introduces new dependencies
* Probably it’s going to introduce a performance penalty because eatables is slow.

I’m asking in reviews for this feature to be enabled/disabled via a flag.


I'm understand that. All neutron/ovs stuff is horrible in term of performance. But it makes compromise between security fix and 'concerns'. I do not worry about problem, I worry about trading security for something else. If this is not fixed, why bother to talk about 'supported/unsupported' versions of openstack?

Btw: If it is good enough for Libre, why it is not good enough for Kilo?
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Reply via email to