Just a suggestion: Rather than define Œusers¹ why not lean on the persona¹s that the UX group created?
(disclaimer - I¹m part of the UX group) From: Shamail <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 4:19 PM To: Edgar Magana <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [recognition] Non-ATC Recognition WG Meeting Today (5/12/2016) Hi Edgar, On May 19, 2016, at 7:00 PM, Edgar Magana <[email protected]> wrote: Shamail and Team, Where are we I defining the activities for recognizing OpenStack Users? In my mind we have completed the definition and we agreed on: AUC Active User Contributor We encourage the following activities: * Organizers of any of the groups.openstack.org <http://groups.openstack.org> * Active members and contributors to Functional Teams and/or Working Groups. * Operators meet-up moderator * Contributing to any repository under the UC governance (i.e. os-ops and user stories) * Track chairs for OpenStack Summits * Contributors to superuser (articles, interviews, user stories, etc.) * Active moderators on ask.openstack If all this make sense, Do we still need to have this WG? We have agreed on the contributors for phase 1 of the user-committee constituency and we are currently working on milestone-3 which is to define the metrics (and methods used to collect metrics) associated with the given activities. We have a few more milestones remaining[1] which concludes with us wrapping up the findings and sharing them with the user committee. I think it still makes sense for the working group to exist (for now) since we still need to formulate how we will capture the necessary metrics to validate that an individual meets the requirements for one of the roles mentioned by you. We are also thinking about how to automate data collection and possibly integrate these metrics with Stackalytics (longer term) to give credit via that tool. Please let me know if pursuing the remaining milestones make sense since we started the WG to help meet objectives given to us by the user committee. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=NonATCRecognition&mobileaction =toggle_view_desktop#Milestones Thanks, Shamail Thanks, Edgar From: Shamail <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, May 12, 2016 at 9:04 AM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [Openstack-operators] [recognition] Non-ATC Recognition WG Meeting Today (5/12/2016) Hi everyone, The Non-ATC Recognition WG will be meeting today and the agenda has been posted on our wiki[1]. The team will be reviewing the results from working session in Austin in today's meeting. Meeting information: Date: 5/12 Time: 1900 UTC <x-apple-data-detectors://3> IRC Channel: #openstack-meeting-3 [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NonATCRecognition <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.openstack.org_wi ki_NonATCRecognition&d=CwMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc &r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=dUhuG0ctBxVkxyXgUSqylXcu4C 9AI_p_yhpVEVdDU28&s=tjOITg7VH7KsJPwnZiB9PwqRQ6E0Man32sD5hnPXI-M&e=> Thank you, Shamail _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
