On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Zed A. Shaw <zeds...@zedshaw.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 12:03:28PM -0800, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: > > There have been numerous mailing list discussions about common auth > methods. I feel like we end up devolving into theoretical discussions at > some point, and I find it hard to evaluate different approaches without > example code. Termie, Jesse, Paul Voccio, and I had a discussion in person > the other day about a possible common implementation for auth. > > ... > > We decided to go ahead and implement a prototype. Furhter information > available here: > > > > That's what I'm talking about. Code wins. > > Alright, I want to help with this. What do you guys need next? How do > I get in on it? When's your next meeting about it? Can we hack on it > at PyCon? I think we've got the initial code covered but code review help to clean up some rough edges for the initial bits, and then I think there are a ton of things to improve upon and a lot of places to start integrating the authz portions into the system. I think we'd also love to experiment with some signed-request options rather than just a bearer token, though I think we've got good traction on the first pass so I just want to get it into trunk and start from there :) --andy > -- > Zed A. Shaw > http://zedshaw.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
