Lorin, I think there is a lot of interest in having a container type vm next to a fully virtualized vm. I see the distinction between services as needing root vs non-root applications. Database, firewall, lb type services may not need a fully virtualized vm.
pvo On 4/1/11 10:38 AM, "Thierry Carrez" <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: >Lorin Hochstein wrote: >> We didn't have this use case in mind when we did our initial >>implementation of heterogeneous instance types, but it's an interesting >>idea and should be pretty straightforward to implement (says the guy at >>ISI who probably contributed the least amount of code to the >>heterogeneous implementation...). Is there community interest in this >>type of functionality? > >>From my (limited) point of view, there is a lot of value for a provider >to being able to offer a choice between container-type "light" VMs >(through LXC) and virtualized-type "full" VMs (through KVM), in the same >cloud. > >-- >Thierry Carrez (ttx) >Release Manager, OpenStack > >_______________________________________________ >Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack >Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net >Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack >More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message (including any attached or embedded documents) is intended for the exclusive and confidential use of the individual or entity to which this message is addressed, and unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged information of Rackspace. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of the enclosed material is prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@rackspace.com, and delete the original message. Your cooperation is appreciated. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
