On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 04:48:54PM -0700, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: > > On Aug 2, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Zed A. Shaw wrote: > > > It does the same thing, but it's using the Python AST so it's accurate > > about what it's checking and source lines, etc. It is slower though, > > but about 2 seconds. > > :( No one likes slower, but i guess it gives us a chance to do some > additional checking.
Alrighty, I'm going to beef this up and have it check for a few more simple things that you can now do accurately with the AST: 1. Strings that have format but are *not* in a _() call. 2. Correct format string layout, better than just > 1 %. 3. Maybe, write out a list of _() calls that aren't translated yet. Not sure if this is best in a test or as a tool though. What you think? -- Zed A. Shaw http://zedshaw.com/ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
