I don't know, but there are several obvious next steps: - Document publicly the criteria for a project to fit - Identify resources available to participating projects - Formalize it with the PPB and unleash it - Build the Satellite community
A big question we didn't discuss is what the governance model for Satellite should be. I don't necessarily think that a contributor to Satellite should be treated the same as a core contributor (eg: vote on the PTLs etc). But there may be building blocks within Satellite that need to be governed on their own.
I think some of the standards around APIs that cut across services are things that Satellite contributors should have a say in. I definitely think things like QA and CI matter a lot (perhaps more) to Satellite.
On 10/14/2011 11:24 AM, David Medberry wrote:
Hi, I've not seen anything following the ODS about OpenStack Satellite (or whatever new name has been proposed). Is discussion going on another list? I also don't see an etherpad for it posted here: http://wiki.openstack.org/EssexSummitEtherpads Was the discussion captured somewhere else? -dave _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
This email may include confidential information. If you received it in error, please delete it. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp