On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Kiall Mac Innes <ki...@managedit.ie> wrote: > > On Oct 14, 2011 10:54 p.m., "Jay Pipes" <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I would advise NOT having any particular governance model for >> Satellite projects. The projects themselves should self-govern by the >> cultural norms of the programming language communities that are >> relevant to the project; since Satellite projects can be anything >> related to OpenStack -- just not the core reference implementations of >> the OpenStack APIs -- there really shouldn't be a governance model >> that attempts to control or limit this ecosystem. At least, that's >> just my opinion! > > +1 > > The way I see it, HybridFox as a tool with openstack support, should be > able to be listed without any changes (other than ensuring compatibility) . > > Its tools like these that add value to openstack, while never being even > remotely close to core projects that Satellite should provide for. > > If CI, SCM hosting etc are provided, it should be very, very loose. If any > attempt at control is asserted, Satellite will turn into an incubator.
Right, and we already have an incubation process that is well-defined for projects that *do* wish to eventually be core OpenStack projects... -jay _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp