On 10/21/2011 03:26 PM, Soren Hansen wrote: > 2011/10/21 Monty Taylor <[email protected]>: >> On 10/21/2011 03:16 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>> Best, IMHO, would be to maintain python-novaclient directly inside >>> the nova project, since this way we can do a version depend. >> There was a discussion about this at the design summit, and it was >> decided against for now because this winds up causing problems for >> python depends in pip-based installs. (there is no idea of a source >> package creating multiple binary packages in pip, so for people who >> just need nova client to have to install nova and all of its depends >> is problematic.) > > Just because they're in the same repository, they don't have to be the > same "source package". They could have separate top-level directories > (so each their own setup.py and whatnot), but in the same repository. > That way, we can keep them separate, but still in sync. >
Yeah - I would personally very much like to avoid this. It doesn't solve anything for what Thomas is talking about since what's in the git repo isn't important for packaging - the more important thing there is what's in the tarball - and those would continue to be separate. Monty _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
