Cool. Just a thought I was having, that others might want to chime in on.
Has there been any thinking around only using eventlet/greenlet for webserver endpoints and using something like multiprocessing for everything else? I know its a fundamental change, but it would force people to think about how to break up there code into something that would work with a message passing architecture (this is already happening with nova + rabbitmq). Nova is a good example, but my thought was to go even further and have anything that needs to run for a long time (ie a equivalent of a nova manager) that is shared inside a application also be a separate "process" with a queue for message passing. Then maybe eventlet/greenlet isn't needed at all? This would force good interfaces, and we wouldn't have to worry about missing a monkey patch. Maybe the python people plan for multiprocess to replace eventlet/greenlet in the end anyway??? Thoughts? On 2/29/12 12:48 PM, "Vishvananda Ishaya" <vishvana...@gmail.com> wrote: Hello Everyone, We have had a memory leak due to an interaction with eventlet for a while that Johannes has just made a fix for. bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/903199 fix: https://bitbucket.org/which_linden/eventlet/pull-request/10/monkey-patch-threadingcurrent_thread-as Unfortuantely, I don' t think we have a decent workaround for nova while that patch is upstreamed. I wanted to make sure that all of the distros are aware of it in case they want to carry an eventlet patch to prevent the slow memory leak. Vish
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
