> From: Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> > Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:32:23 +0200 > > j...@redhat.com wrote: > >> * Switch to rootwrap_config and deprecate root_helper > >> This would fully align quantum-rootwrap with nova-rootwrap. However > I'm > >> not sure it's reasonable to deprecate root_helper=sudo in Folsom, > given > >> how little tested quantum-rootwrap seems to be on Folsom. Maybe just > >> introducing rootwrap_config but leaving the deprecation message out ? > >> You can have a look at: > >> > https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/2b2c97eb5ca332ce7d1f83e4fd2e81fabe0acb66 > >> > > > > Ok. I did talk through this issue with Bob yesterday, but I'd be > > lying if I said I understood it all yet. > > > > Let me ask this: Since, as you say, there's not a lot of evidence of > > traffic through quantum-rootwrap, is there an obvious downside to > > deprecating root_helper=sudo at this stage? I'm not advocating either > > way, just trying to get up to speed on all the parts of the issue. > > Well, since there is not a lot of evidence of traffic through the > rootwrap, that means almost everyone is using root_helper=sudo. Marking > it deprecated, and recommending that everyone switches to the (untested > yet) rootwrap doesn't sound that much like a great idea. >
Ah. Ok, got it. > I think we should deprecate root_helper=sudo when we are confident that > most people are using rootwrap and are satisfied with it. > Yes, concur. Thanks. Onward... _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp