Dan Wendlandt wrote: > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya > <vishvana...@gmail.com <mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > This is up to dan, I suppose, but the rootwrap stuff seems like > something worth granting a ffe to… > > > I wasn't going to mention it, as the urgency of a nearby deadline can be > helpful :) > > But yes, I'd grant an ffe to something this important, especially > because it applies across all uses of quantum.
On one hand it's a change that impacts almost all use cases, so definitely not something that is simple or self-contained. On the other, it's quite easy to trace back issues to this. In summary, if it's the only exception in Quantum, it's not really a problem :) [warning: a trick is included in the last paragraph] -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
