On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org>wrote:
> Dan Wendlandt wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya > > <vishvana...@gmail.com <mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > This is up to dan, I suppose, but the rootwrap stuff seems like > > something worth granting a ffe to… > > > > > > I wasn't going to mention it, as the urgency of a nearby deadline can be > > helpful :) > > > > But yes, I'd grant an ffe to something this important, especially > > because it applies across all uses of quantum. > > On one hand it's a change that impacts almost all use cases, so > definitely not something that is simple or self-contained. On the other, > it's quite easy to trace back issues to this. In summary, if it's the > only exception in Quantum, it's not really a problem :) > > [warning: a trick is included in the last paragraph] > ttx, I caught it.... I'm on to your project management jedi mind tricks :) jrd, my feeling is that we'd need a patch for this under review this week to understand the magnitude of the changes if we want to consider if for a feature-freeze exception. Thanks. dan > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > Release Manager, OpenStack > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dan Wendlandt Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com twitter: danwendlandt ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp