Am 25.08.2014 14:08, schrieb Sid Boyce: > On 25/08/14 09:48, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: >> On 26.06.2014 21:44, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Hi Sean et al., >>> >>> Yesterday I finally received my Parallella board and last night managed >>> to get Factory working on it. I roughly summarized my steps here: >>> >>> http://en.opensuse.org/HCL:Parallella >>> >>> - U-Boot is already on flash >>> - FAT partition with uImage, devicetree.dtb, parallella.bit.bin >>> - rootfs as usual >>> >>> I'm hoping to get upstream kernel working, be it without HDMI, so >>> holding off packaging their kernel. If someone else wants to, go ahead. >> >> Nice, would be great to have JeOS-parallella >> > I totally agree.
Guys, then get your hands dirty and package it yourself! :) https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:Zynq already exists. And you can always branch JeOS into your home: project. kernel-ifc6410 made me finally give up packaging downstream kernels; I will rather put my energy into enhancing the upstream kernel, which we then get via Kernel:HEAD -> Kernel:stable -> Factory[:ARM]. I've spent too much time fixing build warnings/errors of BSP kernels only to find that the resulting binary in the package gives no serial console output or __logbuf info at all, or it fails to properly install through zypper with weird unresolved dependencies. :/ With v3.17-rc1, in the next days we'll have a kernel-default that supports UART console and Ethernet, but no USB or HDMI yet. Not sure if that's what the average user of a JeOS-parallella image expects? Packaging the two bitstream files is a trivial first step that's needed either way. Probably we should dig out the respective source files and package those alongside then. Anyone? Regards, Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
