Hi Alex, 2016-09-19 10:32 GMT+02:00 Alexander Graf <[email protected]>:
> Yes, but it's a can of worms that we have to open anyway unfortunately. > Systems are growing and I doubt 42 bits are going to get us very far. sure, I still prefer to have tests, and even tests that are passing over just enablign something and then not fixing it. >> Are we talking about 42.2 or tumbleweed ? I'm sort of okay with doing >> that for 42.2 when we document it properly and mayb ealso fix the swap >> issue. Because I seriously hope not that many people are using btrfs. > You mean if you're on an ext4 rootfs and upgrade to 42.2, swap should > stay working? Any constructive ideas? Well, the problem is that boot completely fails since systemd considers a non-mountable swap a fatal error condition, and you can not easily recover from that if you don't have serial console. swapon --fixpgsize is to the rescue though. Alternatively we could try to convince it to not fail to boot just because swap isn't there. >> For tumbleweed, I would only want to switch when we have sorted out >> the remaining issues. And only because I am going to be hit by this >> badly > What are "the remaining issues"? 48 bit, yast2-bootloader seems broken again. I fixed ovmf over the weekend finally. Greetings, Dirk -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
